Wednesday, 7 December 2011

The History of ESS Courtesy of the Jolly Roger




Of all the new 1960s wonders of telephone technology -



satellites, ultra modern Traffic Service Positions (TSPS) for



operators, the picturephone, and so on - the one that gave Bell



Labs the most trouble, and unexpectedly became the greatest



development effort in Bell System's history, was the perfection



of an electronic switching system, or ESS.





It may be recalled that such a system was the specific end in



view when the project that had culminated in the invention of the



transistor had been launched back in the 1930s. After successful



accomplishment of that planned miracle in 1947-48, further delays



were brought about by financial stringency and the need for



further development of the transistor itself. In the early 1950s,



a Labs team began serious work on electronic switching. As early



as 1955, Western Electric became involved when five engineers



from the Hawthorne works were assigned to collaborate with the



Labs on the project. The president of AT&T in 1956, wrote



confidently, "At Bell Labs, development of the new electronic



switching system is going full speed ahead. We are sure this will



lead to many improvements in service and also to greater



efficiency. The first service trial will start in Morris, Ill.,



in 1959." Shortly thereafter, Kappel said that the cost of the



whole project would probably be $45 million.





But it gradually became apparent that the developement of a



commercially usable electronic switching system - in effect, a



computerized telephone exchange - presented vastly greater



technical problems than had been anticipated, and that,



accordingly, Bell Labs had vastly underestimated both the time



and the investment needed to do the job. The year 1959 passed



without the promised first trial at Morris, Illinois; it was



finally made in November 1960, and quickly showed how much more



work remained to be done. As time dragged on and costs mounted,



there was a concern at AT&T and something approaching panic at



Bell Labs. But the project had to go forward; by this time the



investment was too great to be sacrificed, and in any case,



forward projections of increased demand for telephone service



indicated that within a phew years a time would come when,



without the quantum leap in speed and flexibility that electronic



switching would provide, the national network would be unable to



meet the demand. In November 1963, an all-electronic switching



system went into use at the Brown Engineering Company at Cocoa



Beach, Florida. But this was a small installation, essentially



another test installation, serving only a single company.



Kappel's tone on the subject in the 1964 annual report was, for



him, an almost apologetic: "Electronic switching equipment must



be manufactured in volume to unprecedented standards of



reliability.... To turn out the equipment economically and with



good speed, mass production methods must be developed; but, at



the same time, there can be no loss of precision..." Another year



and millions of dollars later, on May 30, 1965, the first



commercial electric centeral office was put into service at



Succasunna, New Jersey.





Even at Succasunna, only 200 of the town's 4,300 subscribers



initially had the benefit of electronic switching's added speed



and additional services, such as provision for three party



conversations and automatic transfer of incoming calls. But after



that, ESS was on its way. In January 1966, the second commercial



installation, this one serving 2,900 telephones, went into



service in Chase, Maryland. By the end of 1967 there were



additional ESS offices in California, Connecticut, Minnesota,



Georgia, New York, Florida, and Pennsylvania; by the end of 1970



there were 120 offices serving 1.8 million customers; and by 1974



there were 475 offices serving 5.6 million customers.





The difference between conventional switching and electronic



switching is the difference between "hardware" and "software"; in



the former case, maintenence is done on the spot, with



screwdriver and pliers, while in the case of electronic



switching, it can be done remotely, by computer, from a centeral



point, making it possible to have only one or two technicians on



duty at a time at each switching center. The development program,



when the final figures were added up, was found to have required



a staggering four thousand man-years of work at Bell Labs and to



have cost not $45 million but $500 million!


No comments:

Post a Comment

ads

Followers